Cardio Vs Weights

It is an old topic that comes up time and time again. The modern school of thought is that training with weights will burn more calories over time (post workout) but during the actual exercise period card exercise will burn more. But that doesn’t take into account the level of intensity one can train at, or how of often one can weight train compared to cardio, or what type of cardio is done compared to what type of weight training you are doing.

Here is a good article to explain these issues further.

The Moving Crew
Cardio vs. Weights: The Battle Is Over

By Laura S. Jones
Special to The Washington Post
Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Among the fitness questions we receive, some are perennial favorites. Like this one: Which is better for scorching up calories: cardio workouts or weight training?

The short answer is — you’re not going to like this — you need to do both. Quit your groaning. It’s not as hard as it seems. But first, an explanation.

“The calorie-burning debate gets complicated quickly,” says Miriam Nelson, author of “Strong Women Stay Slim” and director of the John Hancock Center for Physical Activity and Nutrition at Tufts University. “You are probably burning more calories when you are actually moving a heavy weight than when you are doing aerobic exercise. But you are taking breaks, so over 30 minutes the actual number of calories burned doing strength training will be less.”

Time factors into the contest another way, too: “You are limited in the amount of strength training you can do,” says Nelson, a fellow of the American College of Sports Medicine. The ACSM advises you weight-train no more than two to three times per week, to give the body time to repair microscopic muscle tears produced by training that are key to gaining strength. “But you can do cardiovascular exercise every day,” Nelson says.

“Ideally, you want a combination of moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise and moderate-intensity strength training. But if vigorous aerobic exercise and vigorous weight training went head-to-head for calories burned, vigorous aerobic exercise would win.”

Nelson’s call is supported by the ponderously named “Compendium of Physical Activities Tracking Guide.” The guide is used by the ACSM and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, among other august authorities, to classify hundreds of physical activities by energy expenditure. The expenditure is measured in METs, or metabolic equivalents. The more METs an activity requires, the harder the activity and the more calories burned.

Doing circuit training (a series of exercises using different muscle groups, with minimal rest in between) requires eight METs, the same as running at a speed of 5 mph. To increase to 6 mph (a 10-minute-mile pace), you need 10 METs. Heavy weight lifting, by contrast, requires only six METs; light weight lifting, three. In other words, you have to work very hard at a non-cardiovascular exercise such as weight lifting to get to the same MET level reached by less-intense cardiovascular exercise. And only cardio will take you into the highest calorie-burning realm.

However, says Nelson, the cardio-vs.-strength debate overlooks two factors that are key to weight loss and weight maintenance. One is calorie intake. You can burn as many calories as you like with exercise, but if you eat them back, you won’t lose weight. “Most people will eat to compensate for calories burned unless they are very careful.”

The second factor, Nelson says: “All movement matters. It is the total volume of exercise over the day that is most important. Both planned exercise and lifestyle activities count.” So you can’t take just one dose of exercise and do whatever you want for the other 23 hours.

To combine cardio and strength training, you can either look at your week or your workout as a place to mix it up. If you exercise six days a week, you could use three days for 60-minute cardio workouts and three days for 30 minutes of cardio plus 30 minutes of strength training. Or you could order the combo platter.

If a new client wanting to lose weight came to Lance Breger, head trainer at Mint Fitness in Northwest Washington, he would recommend “circuit-style strength training” because it keeps the heart rate elevated, increases caloric afterburn and builds muscle. The exercises can be all strength exercises (switching muscle groups from chest to back or arms to legs) or a combination of strength and cardio exercises (a set of pull-downs followed by a lap around the track or three minutes on a bike).

Breger explains that a good program for general fitness involves a combination of cardio and strength. The bottom line for Breger is that “to burn more calories during exercise, you need to increase oxygen consumption [another measure of energy expenditure], which means you have to work harder.”

So the debate is over. Shake hands, boys. It’s a tie. Cardiovascular exercise and strength training can go have a small, low-fat, low-sugar, moderate-protein smoothie together and chuckle about the days when they were adversaries competing for our attention.

Laura S. Jones is a freelance writer living in Charlottesville. She is certified as a health fitness instructor by the American College of Sports Medicine.

Leave a Comment